Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) discourse analysis (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: discourse analysis


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines183 - : Arús, J. (2004). Understanding 'how' we mean through discourse analysis: A contrastive example using Systemic-Functional Grammar . En M. Carretero, H. Herrera-Soler, G. Kristiansen & J. Lavid (Eds.), Estudios de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación (pp. 29-64). Madrid: Departamento de Filología Inglesa de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. [ [71]Links ]

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines282 - : [...] a comprehensive map of appraisal resources that we could deploy systematically in discourse analysis, both with a view to understanding the rhetorical effect of evaluative lexis as texts unfold, and to better understanding the interplay of interpersonal meaning and social relations in the model of language and the social we were developing, especially in the area of solidarity (Martin, 2000: 148 ).

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines283 - : [...] a comprehensive map of appraisal resources that we could deploy systematically in discourse analysis, both with a view to understanding the rhetorical effect of evaluative lexis as texts unfold, and to better understanding the interplay of interpersonal meaning and social relations in the model of language and the social we were developing, especially in the area of solidarity (Martin, 2000: 148 ).

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines313 - : Romanian workplace communication has changed significantly in the past two decades. Multinational companies have implemented Western European and American communicative practices and pattern. Thus, new communicative patterns have emerged in professional Romanian. In this paper we present part of the results of a larger on-going research project, 'Professional Language in Present-day Romanian. Linguistic Patterns and Discursive Structures', which is supported by a governmental, grant (CNCSIS, ID 142). Within the frameworks of sociolinguistics and discourse analysis, we will focus on three aspects that cover various linguistic compartments: new textual patterns, lexico-semantic innovations, and salutation formulas . The data for this paper have been selected from the corpus 'Workplace communication. Tentative typology of Romanian professional written texts'. The corpus contains 126 texts, which were written in various fields of activity (commercial, production, administrative, educational,

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines353 - : Arús, J. (2004b). Understanding ‘how’ we mean through discourse analysis: A contrastive example using Systemic Functional Grammar . In M. Carretero, H. Herrera-Soler, G. Kristiansen & J. Lavid (Eds.), Estudios de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación (pp. 29-64). Madrid: Departamento de Filología Inglesa de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines454 - : Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: an approach to researching online communities . In S. A. Barab, R. Kling & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338-376). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. [ [142]Links ]

7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines544 - : Causino Lamar, M. A., Obler, L. K., Knoefel, J. E. & Albert, M. L. (1994). Communication patterns in end-stage Alzheimer’s disease: Pragmatic analysis. En R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S. DeSanti & J. S. Ehrlich (Eds.) Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations (pp . 127-235). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. [ [96]Links ]

8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines551 - : The aim of this article is to account for the analysis of the reality represented in the construction of discourse, from a case of a qualitative etnographic study which blends into a double aspect: the disappearance of a minor which ended in tragedy and the supposed guilt of an immigrant belonging to the black race in a murder which had a wide spread media impact. Thus, in this discourse analysis and categorization analysis of the actants, we will try to clarify the different features, components and treatment in the official sites of Twitter and Facebook of four Spanish mass media: @telecincoes, @laSextaNoticias, @NoticiasCuatro and @A3Noticias . The results bring to light how discourse in social networks has a much wider projection if it is based on aporophobia, revealing itself as a ‘parallel trial’ normalized before certain social events, approach which is boosted by mass media itself.

9
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines599 - : “Metadiscourse is the commentary on a text made by its producer in the course of speaking or writing and it is a widely used term in current discourse analysis and language teaching” (^[44]Hyland, 2017:16 ).

Evaluando al candidato discourse analysis:


1) understanding: 6 (*)
3) texts: 4 (*)
4) patterns: 4 (*)
6) professional: 3

discourse analysis
Lengua: eng
Frec: 186
Docs: 96
Nombre propio: 1 / 186 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Puntaje: 3.605 = (3 + (1+4.16992500144231) / (1+7.54689445988764)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
discourse analysis
: Antaki, Ch., Billig, M., Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analythic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online. [en línea]. Disponible en: [40]http://www.shu.ac.uk/daolprevious/v1/n1/index.htm
: Baker, P. (1997). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Londres: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.
: Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Continuum.
: Bernardo Paniagua, J. Mª, López García, G., Sancho Cremades, P. & Serra Alegre, E. (Eds.) (2007). Critical discourse analysis of media texts. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
: Berry, M. (1981a). Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi–layered approach to exchange structure. M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in Discourse Analysis (pp. 120–145). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
: Bolívar, A. (1986). Interaction through written text. Discourse analysis of newspaper editorials. Tesis doctoral no publicada, University of Birmingham.
: Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. Londres: Continuum .
: Coulthard, M. (1992). Advances in spoken discourse analysis. Londres: Routledge.
: Coulthard, M. C., & Montgomery, M. (Eds.). (1981). Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge y Kegan Paul.
: Dessouter, C. (2006). Le processus de simplification du langage administratif en France. En M. Gotti & D. Giannoni (Eds.), New trends in specialized discourse analysis (pp. 163-182). Berna: Lang.
: Dijkstra, K., Bourgeois, M. S., Allen, R. S. & Burgio, L. D. (2004). Conversational coherence: Discourse analysis of older adults with and without dementia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(4), 263-283.
: Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertation. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text. Discourse analysis monograph 13 (pp. 128-145). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
: FAIRCLOUGH N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. The critical study of language. London/New York: Longman.
: Fairclough, I. & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students. London and New York: Routledge.
: Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. En T. A. van Dijk (Comp.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258-284). Londres: Sage.
: Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 133-168.
: Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman
: Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Londres: Routledge.
: Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J. & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 357-378). London: SAGE.
: Fortanet, I., Palmer, J. & Postiguillo, S. (2001). Hedging devices in technical and academic English. En J. Palmer, S. Posteguillo & I. Fortanet (Eds.), Discourse analysis and terminology in languages for specific purposes (pp. 241-257). Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.
: Francis, G. (1986). Anaphoric nouns. Discourse analysis monograph no. 11. Birmingham: English Language Research.
: Francis, G. y Hunston, S. (1992). Analysing Everyday Conversation. Coulthard, M. (ed) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
: Gee, J. & Handford, M. (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Londres: Rouledge.
: Gee, J. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method. Nueva York: Routledge.
: Gotti, M. & Salager-Meyer, F. (Eds.) (2006). Advances in medical discourse analysis: Oral and written contexts. Bern: Peter Lang .
: Gumperz, J. (2001). Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. En D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 215-229). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
: Hamilton, H. E. (1994b). Requests for clarification as evidence of pragmatic comprehension difficulty: The case of Alzheimer's disease. Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations, 185-199.
: Harris, Z. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language, 28, 1-30.
: Horvath, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis of Obama’s political discourse. Language, Literature and Culture in Changing Transatlantic World, International Conference Proceedings (pp. 22-23). University Library of Presov University.
: Hyland, K. (2009). Corpus informed discourse analysis: The case of academic engagement. En M. Charles, D. Pecorari & S. Hunston. (Eds.), Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse (pp. 110-128). Londres: Continuum.
: KhosraviNik, M. (2010). The presentation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers. A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(1), 1-28.
: Lakoff, R. (2001). Nine ways of looking at apologies: The necessity for interdisciplinary theory and method in Discourse Analysis. En D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 199-214). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
: Markkanen, R. & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenger for pragmaticis and discourse analysis. En R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse. Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3-18). Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
: Martin, J. R. (1997b). Register and genre: modelling social context in functional linguistics - narrative genres. En E. Pedro (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Lisbon International Meeting on Discourse Analysis. Lisbon: Colibri/APL.
: Martin, J. R. (2001). Cohesion and texture. En D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 35-53). Massachussets: Blackwell Publishers.
: Martin, J.R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Power, solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49, 179-200.
: Menéndez, S. M. (2005a). Gramática, análisis del discurso e interpretación crítica: Las relaciones no tan evidentes. Proceedings of the Internacional Conference on Critical Discourse Analysis. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia. (Edición en CD).
: Montgomery, M. (2011). Discourse and the news. En K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis (pp. 213-227). Londres: Continuum.
: Moore, J. & Pollack, M. (1992). A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18, 537-544.
: Mulderrig, J. (2012). The hegemony of inclusion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of deixis in educational policy. Discourse & Society, 23(6), 701-728.
: Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A. & Van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. Tesol Quarterly, 35(3), 377-405.
: Oyebode, O. & Unuabonah, F. O. (2013). Coping with HIV/AIDS: A multimodal discourse analysis of selected HIV/AIDS posters in south-western Nigeria. Discourse & Society, 24(6), 810-827.
: O’Halloran, K. (2007). Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics, 28, 1-24.
: O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 120-137). London and New York: Continuum.
: Pinto, D. (2004). Indoctrinating the youth of Post-war Spain: A discourse analysis of a fascist civics textbook. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 649-667.
: Richardson, J. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
: Rogers, R. (2004). An introduccion to critical discourse analysis. Nueva Yersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Royce, T. (2007). Inter-semiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. En T. Royce & W. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63-109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
: Salager-Meyer, F. (1991). A text-type based discourse analysis of medical English. Abstracts internal structuring. Ponencia presentada en the Second Latin American ESP Colloquium, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
: Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for academic purposes, 7(1), 55-67.
: Schiffrin, D. (2003). Discourse markers: Language, meaning and context. En D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 54-75). Oxford: Blackwell.
: Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1992). Towards an analysis of discourse. En M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 1-35). Londres: Routledge.
: Sinclair, J. (1986). Fictional worlds. En M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text. Discourse Analysis Monographs 13 (pp.43-60). Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
: Suh, S. y Trabasso, T. (1993) Inferences during reading: converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-300.
: Swales, J. (1986). Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 39-56.
: Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. Londres: Sage Publications.
: Upton, T. A. & Cohen, M. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse studies, 11(5), 585-605.
: Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Semantic discourse analysis.Handbook of discourse analysis, 2, 103-136.
: Van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4 (2), 249-83.
: Van Dijk, T.A. (1996). Discourse, power and access. En C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices. Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84-104). Londres: Routledge.
: Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. New tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116.
: Wilson, J. (2001). Political discourse. En D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 398-415). Oxford: Blackwell.
: Wodak, R. & Chilton, P. (Eds). (2005). A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE.
: Wodak, R. (1995). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. En J. O. Varscheueren, J-O Östman & J. Blommart (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 204-210). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 63-94). Londres: Sage.
: Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis. A cross-disciplinary enquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 203-225.
: Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. En K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis (pp. 38-53.). Londres: Continuum.
: Wodak, R. (Ed). (2013). Critical discourse analysis. Londres, UK: Sage.
: Wooffit, R. (1996). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis. A comparative and critical study. Londres: Sage.
: Yuen, C. Y. (2004). The construal of ideational meaning in print advertisements. En K. O'Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis. Systemic Functional Perspectives (pp. 163-195). Londres & Nueva York: Continuum.
: de Swart, H. E. (2007). A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the perfect. Journal of pragmatics, 39(12), 2273-2307.
: van Dijk, T. (1996). Discourse, power and access. En C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84-104). London: Routledge.
: van Dijk, T. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95-120). London: Sage.
: van Dijk, T. A. (2006b). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115-140.
: van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical Discourse Studies: A sociocognitive approach. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 62-85). Londres: Sage.
: van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Critical discourse analysis. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course. An overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 277-292). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.